试述红楼梦《红楼梦》中模糊限制语语用功能学术

论文导读：-282.3ExplanationoftheFourMaxims28-322.3.1ExplanationoftheQuaptyMaxim292.3.2ExplanationoftheQuantityMaxim29-302.3.3ExplanationoftheRelationMaxim30-312.3.4ExplanationoftheMannerMaxim31-322.4TheRelationshipsBetweentheMaxims32-34ChapterThreePragmaticAnalysisofHedgesi
摘要：基于对语言模糊性的探讨,Lakoff于1972年对一类词下了定义。他把这类能使语言变得更模糊或者不那么模糊的词称为模糊限制语。模糊限制语广泛地有着于人们的日常生活中。模糊限制语自以被提出以来,就得到了广泛的探讨,讨论。探讨者分别以语法,语义,语用等各方面对其进行了探讨,但是很少有人探讨文学作品中的模糊限制语。Paul Grice基于对人类交际机制的探讨,于1967年提出了举世闻名的合作原则这一论述。该论述认为在日常对话中,为了对话的顺利进行,人们总是愿意合作的。该论述含有四个准则,包括质的准则,量的准则,联系准则和方式准则。这个论述被广泛地运用于浅析人类日常生活和文学作品中的话语。本论文也将采取这一原则浅析《红楼梦》中的模糊限制语。《红楼梦》作为中国文学作品中的一部经典作品,已经被大量的探讨者探讨,如对人物性格的探讨,对诗词的探讨,以及菜品的探讨。虽然已经被大量的探讨,但是很少有人探讨其里面的模糊限制语。作为一部反映封建社会生活的百科全书,《红楼梦》蕴含了丰富的语言资料,并且话语中含有大量的模糊限制语。由此,作者希望通过对这些限制语的探讨,浅析,使读者能更好的理解文中人物的性格,以而提升对整部作品的文学鉴赏水平和欣赏能力。关键词：模糊限制语论文《红楼梦》论文合作原则论文语用功能论文
本论文由www.7ctime.com,需要论文可以联系人员哦。摘要3-5
Abstract5-9
Introduction9-12
Chapter One Introduction to Hedges12-24

1.1 Definition of Hedges12-13

1.2 The Researches on Hedges in the West and in China13-19
1.2.1 The Researches on Hedges in the West13-17
1.2.2 The Researches on Hedges in China17-19

1.3 Classifications of Hedges19-24

Chapter Two Introduction to Cooperative Principle24-34

2.1 Grice and Cooperative Principle24-25

2.2 Researches in the West and in China25-28

2.1 Researches in the West25-27

2.2 Researches in China27-28

2.3 Explanation of the Four Maxims28-32

2.3.1 Explanation of the Quapty Maxim29

2.3.2 Explanation of the Quantity Maxim29-30
2.3.3 Explanation of the Relation Maxim30-31
2.

3.4 Explanation of the Manner Maxim31-32

2.4 The Relationships Between the Maxims32-34
Chapter Three Pragmatic Analysis of Hedges in A Dream of Red Mansions34-56
3.1 Pragmatic Functions Generated by Violating the Maxim of Quapty34-45
3.

1.1 Protecting Oneself and Others34-39

3.

1.2 Showing Popteness39-41

3.

1.3 Satirizing41

3.

1.4 Showing Modesty41-42

3.

1.5 Avoiding Responsibipty42-44

3.

1.6 Comforting44-45

3.2 Pragmatic Functions Generated by Violating the Maxim of Quantity45-51
3.2.1 Protecting One论文导读：ness48-493.2.3Satirizing49-503.2.4AvoidingResponsibipty50-513.ragmaticFunctionsGeneratedbyViolatingtheMaximofManner51-563.3.1ShowingDissatiaction51-533.3.2Satirizing53-56Conclusion56-58Bibpography58-62Acknowledgements62上一页12
self and Others45-48
3.

2.2 Showing Popteness48-49

3.

2.3 Satirizing49-50

3.

2.4 Avoiding Responsibipty50-51

3.3 Pragmatic Functions Generated by Violating the Maxim of Manner51-56

3.1 Showing Dissatiaction51-53

3.2 Satirizing53-56

Conclusion56-58
Bibpography58-62
Acknowledgements62