试议名利场功能对等论述与信达雅翻译论比较

论文导读：Review13-252.1ResearchingTrendsAbroad(Nida’sTheory)13-162.1.1PhaseⅠ:DynamicEquivalenceandFormalEquivalence13-142.1.2PhaseⅡ:DynamicEquivalenceandFormalCorrespondence14-152.1.haseⅢ:FunctionalEquivalenceandFormalCorrespondence15-162.2ResearchTrendsatHome16-242.2.1The
摘要：二十世纪六十年代末，美国《圣经》翻译家尤金·奈达提出了在翻译论述和实践进展史上具有重要里程碑作用的“功能对等”翻译论述，这种翻译论述从现代语言学，社会符号学从及信息论为论述基础，其对等不仅仅局限在原语和目的语之间词汇和语法的转换，对原语读者的体会和目的语读者的体会是否一致也同样关注。奈达提倡翻译是客观内容对等而非形式的对等，他还重视目的语接受者的反应，从合适，自然，贴切的目的语表达为翻译的中心任务，这为翻译工作者提供了很重要的翻译论述。随着西方翻译论述对中国翻译论述的影响日益加深，中国的翻译家也渐渐提出了自己的翻译论述。严复从中国传统美学和文学评论为论述基础，提出了著名的“信达雅”翻译标准，这个标准的提出对中国的翻译界有重要的影响，其赞成与反对之声也层出不穷，不管如何，严复的翻译论述确实给翻译者们提供了较为完美的翻译标准。因此看来，奈达的翻译论述与严复的翻译论述都为译者提供了翻译标准，两大著名的翻译论述也存在不同点与相似之处，本论文通过萨克雷《名利场》的中文译本对此作出分析，通过对文化信息的处理，对修辞格的处理从及对词汇、句子、段落、篇章等的处理来对比两大翻译论述，并且分析了差别产生的理由。文章也对奈达“功能对等”翻译论述从及严复的“信达雅”翻译标准作出了详细的解释，同时详细简介了两大论述产生的论述基础。这为我们更好地理解两大翻译家的翻译论述提供了有利条件。本论文在分析严复“信达雅”翻译标准和“功能对等”翻译论述各自特征基础之上，通过解读《名利场》的翻译，分析出译者在两种翻译论述影响下对不同信息的处理，最终找到相同点与不同点，同时，作者也将提出自己的观点，希望广大翻译者在今后的翻译工作中做的更加出色。关键词：奈达论文功能对等论文严复论文信达雅论文异同论文《名利场》论文
本论文由www.7ctime.com,需要可从关系人员哦。摘要8-9
Abstract9-11
1 Introduction11-13

1.1 The Objective of This Study11

1.2 The Significance of This Study11-12

1.3 The Organization of This Study12-13

2 Literature Review13-25
2.1 Researching Trends Abroad (Nida’s Theory)13-16
2.1.1 PhaseⅠ: Dynamic Equivalence and Formal Equivalence13-14
2.1.2 PhaseⅡ: Dynamic Equivalence and Formal Correspondence14-15
2.1.3 Phase Ⅲ: Functional Equivalence and Formal Correspondence15-16

2.2 Research Trends at Home16-24

2.1 The Development of Nida’s Theory16-21

2.2.2 The Development of Yan Fu’s Theory21-24

2.3 Summary24-25

3 Theoretical Foundation25-31
3.1 The Theoretical Foundation of Nida’s Functional Equivalence25-28
3.

1.1 Modern Linguistics25-26

3.

1.2 Information Theory26-27

3.

1.3 Social Semiotics27-28

3.2 The Theoretical Foundation of Yan Fu’s Translation Theory28-31
3.

2.1 Chinese Aesthetics28-29

3.

2.2 Literary Critici29-30

3.

2.3 Summary30-31

4 A Comparative Studies on the Translation Theory of Nida and Yan论文导读：Conclusion58-605.1Implements585.2TheLimitationoftheStudy58-60Acknowledgments60-61References61-64PapersPubpshedinthePeriodofMasterEducation64上一页12
Fu31-58
4.1 Introduction of Vanity Fair and Its Two Chinese Versions31-34
4.1.1 About the Story and the Theme of Vanity Fair31-32
4.

1.2 Comments on Vanity Fair32

4.

1.3 Yang Bi’s Translation Version32-33

4.1.4 Peng Changjiang’s Translation Version33-34
4.2 An Analysis on Functional Equivalence of Nida from Translation of Vanity Fair34-47
4.2.1 An Analysis on the Two Culture Translations of Vanity Fair34-40
4.2.2 An Analysis on the Translations of Vanity Fair from Words, Sentences and Chapters40-44
4.2.3 An Analysis on the Translation of Vanity Fair from Rhetori4-47
4.3 An Analysis on Yan Fu’s Translation Theory from Translation of Vanity Fair47-52
4.3.1 An Analysis on the Translation of Vanity Fair from Chinese Culture47-49
4.3.2 An Analysis on the Translations of Vanity Fair from Words and Sentences49-52
4.4 An Analysis on the Comparative of Translation Theory of Nida and Yan Fu52-58

4.1 The Similarities of Them52-54

4.2 The Differences between Them54-56

4.4.3 The Reasons for Comparisons of Yan Fu’s and Nida’s Translation Theories56-58
5 Conclusion58-60

5.1 Implements58

5.2 The Limitation of the Study58-60

Acknowledgments60-61
References61-64
Papers Pubpshed in the Period of Master Education64